Skip to Main Content
consumer

Independent School District 112 a/k/a Eastern Carver County Schools

T.B. et al. v. Independent School District 112
Court File No. 0:19-cv-02414 (District of Minnesota)

On September 3, 2019, Nichols Kaster and Madia Law filed this federal civil rights case in the District of Minnesota on behalf of six African-American students, alleging Independent School District 112 a/k/a Eastern Carver County Schools allowed racism to permeate its Chaska, Minnesota, schools for years. These students and their parents seek to secure a safe and non-discriminatory learning environment for all students. Despite repeated complaints from students and their families, the district took no meaningful action to address the dangerous and substantially disruptive environment in its schools. Our legal team is working with these brave students and their parents to bring change and accountability to Chaska schools and ensure a learning environment where every student is safe and free from discrimination.

The lawsuit alleges that the district violated the students’ right to equal protection and violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Minnesota Human Rights Act.

How Do I Learn More?

For more information or questions regarding this case, please contact our Case Development Attorney, Kate Fisher, at kfisher@nka.com or call (612) 256-3242.

Type of Case

Violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act, and Equal Protection

Share

Case Updates

  • September 3, 2019

    Chaska Families Represented by Nichols Kaster, PLLP and Madia Law LLC File Federal Civil Rights Lawsuit Against Eastern Carver County School District for Rampant Race Discrimination

    On September 3, 2019, six African-American students, through their parents, filed a civil rights lawsuit against Independent School District 112 a/k/a Eastern Carver County Schools, alleging severe and pervasive racism at the district’s Chaska, Minnesota schools. The lawsuit alleges that the district allowed racism to permeate its schools for years with African-American students having been called “monkey,” told they “don’t belong,” physically assaulted, racially profiled, called the “N word,” and even threatened to be killed. The lawsuit walks through each of the six student’s experiences in the district, cataloguing horrific acts of racism by white students and the district’s deliberate indifference to the same. The lawsuit alleges that the district failed to take any meaningful action in response to parents’ and students’ repeated complaints and exhibited clear bias in favor of white students. As a result, the students have suffered emotional trauma and substantial disruption to their education, and several have left the district out of fear for their physical, personal, and educational well-being. Seeking change, the students brought this suit under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Minnesota Human Rights Act, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution pursuant to Section 1983.

    "Our public schools are supposed to respect and keep children safe while creating an educational environment in which they can thrive. That didn’t happen for African-American students in Chaska,” said Plaintiffs’ attorney Anna P. Prakash of Nichols Kaster, PLLP. “Our clients tried and continue to try to get help from the administration,” said Prakash, “But, with all they have experienced and because meaningful change has not happened, they filed this lawsuit. Given the racial tensions in the district, these students and their parents are incredibly brave. We are honored to represent them.”

    The Plaintiffs are represented by Matthew H. Morgan, Anna P. Prakash, and Laura A. Baures of Nichols Kaster, PLLP, and Joshua A. Newville of Madia Law LLC. The case is T.B., et al. v. Independent School District 112, a/k/a Eastern Carver County Schools, 0:19-cv-02414, and is filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

    Photo by Banter Snaps on Unsplash

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established. Read full Disclaimer.